![]() They were comfortable and hydrating to wear, though they were shorter-wearing due to the amount of slip, so most shades wore for three hours with a few of the richer and deeper shades lasting almost five hours on me. The consistency was lightweight with moderate slip and felt like a lipstick-lip balm hybrid as a result, and the finish was glossier and more luminous (without being overtly shimmery/pearly). The lighter shades were the least forgiving and sometimes emphasized or gathered around lip lines and lip texture, while mid-tone and deeper shades often applied beautifully with even coverage and in a way that made my lips appear smoother and plusher. The formula is supposed to have "sheer to medium, buildable" coverage with "hydrating shine" while helping to "reduce fine, dry lines and lip flakiness." The majority of the shades had more medium, buildable coverage that could be built up to nearly opaque coverage. Makeup Geek Trophy Wife (P, $12.00) is darker, cooler (85% similar).Lancome Moderato (335) (P, $32.00) is lighter, cooler (85% similar).Gucci Beauty Diana Amber (508) (P, $42.00) is more shimmery, lighter, cooler (85% similar).Milani Fantasy (P, $8.99) is cooler (85% similar).Givenchy Rouge Interdit (13) (P, $34.00) is brighter, less glossy (90% similar). ![]() ![]() Cle de Peau Red Carpet (LE, $65.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar).Tom Ford Beauty Jasmin Rouge (P, $57.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar). #Lauder shine fantastical lipstick mac#
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |